There is a moment in most sale processes where a seller’s adjusted earnings stop helping them. It usually arrives around the eleventh add-back.
The first few are unarguable: a one-time legal settlement, the owner’s above-market salary, a discontinued product line. Then the schedule keeps going. Personal travel. The spouse on payroll. The boat. A “one-time” marketing experiment that appears in three consecutive years. By the end the seller has moved reported profit from eight hundred thousand to one point four million and believes they have added six hundred thousand of value.
What they have actually done is teach the buyer that the financial statements are a starting point for negotiation rather than a record of what happened.
This is the part sellers consistently underestimate. A buyer is not evaluating add-backs one at a time. They are forming a view about whether this company’s numbers can be relied upon. The schedule itself is evidence, not about the adjustments, but about the discipline of the business producing them.
Two companies can present identical adjusted earnings and be underwritten completely differently. One has three add-backs, each documented, each obviously non-recurring. The other has nineteen. The first buyer accepts the number and moves to structure. The second buyer accepts a lower number, widens their diligence and, this being the expensive part, reserves more of the purchase price against the possibility that other things are not as presented.
The credibility cost does not show up as a line item. It shows up as a lower multiple, a larger escrow, a longer earnout, and more of the price contingent on results the seller no longer controls.
There is a further problem. Aggressive add-backs frequently disguise a real operating issue from the owner themselves. An expense adjusted out of earnings is an expense nobody is managing. Companies that have spent five years normalizing their way to a respectable figure are often companies that have spent five years not fixing what the adjustments conceal.
The discipline is straightforward, and it should begin long before anyone is thinking about a transaction. Adjust for what a buyer would obviously adjust for, and nothing more. Owner compensation above market. A genuinely non-recurring event. A cost that will demonstrably not exist under new ownership.
Document each one at the time it occurs, not reconstructed from memory two years later during diligence. An add-back with an invoice attached is a fact. An add-back with an explanation attached is an argument.
Treat a long schedule as a signal about the business, not a negotiating asset. If it takes nineteen adjustments to reach a defensible earnings figure, the more useful question is why the operating company produces such an indefensible one.
Buyers price uncertainty. Everything a seller does that increases the number of things a buyer must simply take on faith is paid for somewhere in the structure, usually in a place the seller notices later, and minds more.
Clean books are not an accounting standard. They are a pricing position.
← All thinking